Purpose
A repeatable inquiry method that tests evidence, counter-evidence, assumptions, perspectives and consequences.
Refined doctrine
The first pillar builds the strongest evidence-based case for a claim. The second builds the strongest reasonable case against it. This dual structure reduces confirmation bias by requiring the investigator to engage with material that may weaken the preferred answer.
The third pillar examines assumptions, definitions, missing steps and possible reasoning errors. The fourth adds relevant perspectives without treating every perspective as equally supported. The fifth considers consequences and predictions. The sixth stress-tests the claim under alternative conditions.
The seventh pillar records what survives, what collapses and what remains uncertain. A conclusion improves when new evidence changes it. The willingness to revise protects inquiry from becoming identity defence.
Operating principles
- State the claim precisely enough to test.
- Build the strongest supported case for and against it.
- Expose assumptions and define key terms.
- Record confidence, limitations and disconfirming evidence.
- Reopen the analysis when material evidence changes.
Write the claim, best evidence, best counter-evidence, altered assumption and current surviving conclusion.Think deeply and let stronger evidence change the answer.